<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daz's bits and bobs &#187; performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sigtar.com/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sigtar.com</link>
	<description>…bytes bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>zfs &#8211; now has dedup!</title>
		<link>http://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/</link>
		<comments>http://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dedup=on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synchronous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigtar.com/?p=1105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool. zfs as of version 21 has deduplication built in. And thats the good dedup &#8211; synchronous dedup. i.e. deduped on the fly!
How easy is it to turn on? &#8211; very!
Once you have upgraded your zpool to 21 or above you can run the following command at the pool level and deduplication will be over [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/10/19/opensolaris-zfs-recovery-after-kernel-panic/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic'>Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic</a> <small>Recently i hit what i thought was a huge disaster...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: OpenSolaris &#8211; iSCSI'>OpenSolaris &#8211; iSCSI</a> <small>Want iSCSI in opensolaris? Grab SUNWiscsitgt via package manager. enable...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: zfs compression and latency'>zfs compression and latency</a> <small>Since im using ZFS as storage via NFS for my...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. zfs as of version 21 has deduplication built in. And thats the good dedup &#8211; synchronous dedup. i.e. deduped on the fly!</p>
<p>How easy is it to turn on? &#8211; very!</p>
<p>Once you have upgraded your zpool to 21 or above you can run the following command at the pool level and deduplication will be over all your data from that point onwards.</p>
<p><strong>zpool set dedup=on tank</strong></p>
<p>Done</p>
<p>Note : Watch your performance, it will drop like a rock if you do not have enough ram for your dedup tables. Do some tests after enabling this feature.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/10/19/opensolaris-zfs-recovery-after-kernel-panic/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic'>Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic</a> <small>Recently i hit what i thought was a huge disaster...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: OpenSolaris &#8211; iSCSI'>OpenSolaris &#8211; iSCSI</a> <small>Want iSCSI in opensolaris? Grab SUNWiscsitgt via package manager. enable...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: zfs compression and latency'>zfs compression and latency</a> <small>Since im using ZFS as storage via NFS for my...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HDD short stroking &#8211; is it worth it?</title>
		<link>http://sigtar.com/2009/12/21/hdd-short-stroking-is-it-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://sigtar.com/2009/12/21/hdd-short-stroking-is-it-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raid 0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stripe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigtar.com/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve got some old 250Gb drives that are starting to show their age. I&#8217;ve currently got them setup in a 3x RAID 0 config which presents about 750Gb of space.
I&#8217;ve got everything on a single partition (meh, i&#8217;m lazy). I&#8217;ve done various speed tests in the current setup (with all space allocated), but i thought [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: zfs compression and latency'>zfs compression and latency</a> <small>Since im using ZFS as storage via NFS for my...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/05/07/vmware-measuring-iscsi-write-performance/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance'>vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance</a> <small>I picked this trick up off vmware support. If you&#8217;ve...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got some old 250Gb drives that are starting to show their age. I&#8217;ve currently got them setup in a 3x RAID 0 config which presents about 750Gb of space.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got everything on a single partition (meh, i&#8217;m lazy). I&#8217;ve done various speed tests in the current setup (with all space allocated), but i thought i&#8217;d re-image onto a short stroke partition.</p>
<p>I only use about 150Gb of space on my main machine (most of my data is on another box), so i&#8217;m going to try creating a 200Gb partition to test if this provides any kind of performance boost.</p>
<p>So reducing my raid 0 from 750Gb to 214Gb, and here are the results&#8230;</p>
<p>Before with all 750Gb presented&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HD-Tune-results.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1063" title="HD Tune results" src="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HD-Tune-results.png" alt="" width="570" height="460" /></a></p>
<p>Same disks but short stroked to 214Gb&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HDTune_Benchmark_Intel___Raid_0_Volume.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1064" title="HDTune_Benchmark_Intel___Raid_0_Volume" src="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HDTune_Benchmark_Intel___Raid_0_Volume.png" alt="" width="570" height="460" /></a></p>
<p>Conclusion : Yip, seems like its worth it if you have the spare space. Average throughput is up by 10MB/s and seek has improved by almost a third loosing 4ms.</p>
<p>You will get even more of an improvement if you can use a smaller % of capacity per drive and / or more drives for your stripe.</p>
<p><strong>Updated : 07/02/2010</strong></p>
<p>btw &#8211; the above was without write-back cache enabled&#8230;. if i turned that on i got the following&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HDTune_Benchmark_Intel___Raid_0_Volume1.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1086" title="HDTune_Benchmark_Intel___Raid_0_Volume" src="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HDTune_Benchmark_Intel___Raid_0_Volume1.png" alt="" width="570" height="460" /></a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: zfs compression and latency'>zfs compression and latency</a> <small>Since im using ZFS as storage via NFS for my...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/05/07/vmware-measuring-iscsi-write-performance/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance'>vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance</a> <small>I picked this trick up off vmware support. If you&#8217;ve...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sigtar.com/2009/12/21/hdd-short-stroking-is-it-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenSolaris &#8211; iSCSI</title>
		<link>http://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/</link>
		<comments>http://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 07:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iscsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opensolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigtar.com/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want iSCSI in opensolaris?
Grab SUNWiscsitgt via package manager.
enable the server via svcadm;
svcadm enable iscsitgt
create your zfs iscsi pool;  (this command will limit iscsi drive to 500GB in size)
zfs create -V 500G tank/iscsi
set isci on via zfs command;
zfs set shareiscsi=on tank/iscsi
check that target is up and running;
iscsitadm list target -v 
Done. Should be able to connect [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/02/04/vsphere-and-multipathing-iscsi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: vSphere and Multipathing iSCSI'>vSphere and Multipathing iSCSI</a> <small>This is just a quick reference to create a multiplathing...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/03/02/jumbo-frames-on-your-vsphere-esxi-box/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Jumbo Frames on your vSphere ESXi box'>Jumbo Frames on your vSphere ESXi box</a> <small>Continuing on from this http://sigtar.com/2010/02/04/vsphere-and-multipathing-iscsi/ you may want to implement...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/05/07/vmware-measuring-iscsi-write-performance/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance'>vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance</a> <small>I picked this trick up off vmware support. If you&#8217;ve...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want iSCSI in opensolaris?</p>
<p>Grab SUNWiscsitgt via package manager.</p>
<p>enable the server via svcadm;</p>
<p><strong>svcadm enable iscsitgt</strong></p>
<p>create your zfs iscsi pool;  (this command will limit iscsi drive to 500GB in size)</p>
<p><strong>zfs create -V 500G tank/iscsi</strong></p>
<p>set isci on via zfs command;</p>
<p><strong>zfs set shareiscsi=on tank/iscsi</strong></p>
<p>check that target is up and running;</p>
<p><strong>iscsitadm list target -v </strong></p>
<p>Done. Should be able to connect via ip from another machine. I have not covered CHAP or any client side configuration. Assumed isolated LAN.</p>
<p><a href="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/HDTune_Benchmark_SUN_____SOLARIS.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1027" title="HDTune_Benchmark_SUN_____SOLARIS" src="http://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/HDTune_Benchmark_SUN_____SOLARIS.png" alt="HDTune_Benchmark_SUN_____SOLARIS" width="570" height="460" /></a></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/02/04/vsphere-and-multipathing-iscsi/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: vSphere and Multipathing iSCSI'>vSphere and Multipathing iSCSI</a> <small>This is just a quick reference to create a multiplathing...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/03/02/jumbo-frames-on-your-vsphere-esxi-box/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Jumbo Frames on your vSphere ESXi box'>Jumbo Frames on your vSphere ESXi box</a> <small>Continuing on from this http://sigtar.com/2010/02/04/vsphere-and-multipathing-iscsi/ you may want to implement...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/05/07/vmware-measuring-iscsi-write-performance/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance'>vmware &#8211; measuring iscsi write performance</a> <small>I picked this trick up off vmware support. If you&#8217;ve...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>zfs &#8211; checking your zpool throughput</title>
		<link>http://sigtar.com/2009/02/18/zfs-checking-your-zpool-throughput/</link>
		<comments>http://sigtar.com/2009/02/18/zfs-checking-your-zpool-throughput/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenSolaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iostat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throughput]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zfs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zpool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigtar.com/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is quite a good diagnostic for checking your disk throughput. Try copying data to and from your zpool while your running this command on the host&#8230;
zpool iostat -v unprotected 2
capacity     operations    bandwidth
pool         used  avail   read  write   read  write
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;
unprotected  1.39T [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/10/19/opensolaris-zfs-recovery-after-kernel-panic/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic'>Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic</a> <small>Recently i hit what i thought was a huge disaster...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: zfs &#8211; now has dedup!'>zfs &#8211; now has dedup!</a> <small>Cool. zfs as of version 21 has deduplication built in....</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite a good diagnostic for checking your disk throughput. Try copying data to and from your zpool while your running this command on the host&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>zpool iostat -v unprotected 2</strong></p>
<p><em>capacity     operations    bandwidth</em></p>
<p><em>pool         used  avail   read  write   read  write</em></p>
<p><em>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;</em></p>
<p><em>unprotected  1.39T   668G     18      7  1.35M   161K</em></p>
<p><em>c7d0       696G   403M      1      2  55.1K  21.3K</em></p>
<p><em>c9d0       584G   112G      8      2   631K  69.3K</em></p>
<p><em>c7d1       141G   555G      8      2   697K  70.0K</em></p>
<p><em>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;  &#8212;&#8211;</em></p>
<p>The above command will keep displaying the above output every 2 seconds (average during that time). I&#8217;ve used it a few times to ensure that all disks are being used (in write operations) where needed. Of course read op&#8217;s may not be typically across all disks as it will depend where the data is&#8230;</p>
<p>As you can see in the output from my &#8220;unprotected&#8221; zpool, my disk &#8220;c7d0&#8243; is near full so less write operations will be on this disk. In my scenario most of my reads also come from this disk, this was due me copying most of the data into this zpool when there was only this single disk.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard rumor of a zfs feature in future that will re-balance the data across all the disks (unsure if its live or on a set schedule)</p>
<p>Another way to show some disk throughput figures is to run the <strong>iostat</strong> command like so&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>iostat -x 5 </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">extended device statistics</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">device    r/s    w/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv  svc_t  %w  %b</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk17    1.0    0.0   71.5    0.0  0.0  0.0   10.9   0   1</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk18    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk19    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk20    0.8    0.0   33.5    0.0  0.0  0.0   13.5   0   1</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk21    0.4    0.0    0.5    0.0  0.0  0.0   15.5   0   1</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk22    0.8    0.0   66.3    0.0  0.0  0.0    9.0   0   1</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk23    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 312px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">cmdk24    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0</div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em> extended device statistics </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>device    r/s    w/s   kr/s   kw/s wait actv  svc_t  %w  %b </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk17    1.0    0.0   71.5    0.0  0.0  0.0   10.9   0   1 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk18    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk19    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk20    0.8    0.0   33.5    0.0  0.0  0.0   13.5   0   1 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk21    0.4    0.0    0.5    0.0  0.0  0.0   15.5   0   1 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk22    0.8    0.0   66.3    0.0  0.0  0.0    9.0   0   1 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk23    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0 </em></span></div>
<div><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>cmdk24    0.0    0.0    0.0    0.0  0.0  0.0    0.0   0   0 </em></span></div>
<p></strong></p>
<p>This should show you all your disks and update on a 5 second interval. Copying data back and forth to your drives will show various stats.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/10/19/opensolaris-zfs-recovery-after-kernel-panic/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic'>Opensolaris &#8211; ZFS recovery after kernel panic</a> <small>Recently i hit what i thought was a huge disaster...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: zfs &#8211; now has dedup!'>zfs &#8211; now has dedup!</a> <small>Cool. zfs as of version 21 has deduplication built in....</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sigtar.com/2009/02/18/zfs-checking-your-zpool-throughput/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux &#8211; Hard Drive Performance</title>
		<link>http://sigtar.com/2009/02/03/linux-hard-drive-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://sigtar.com/2009/02/03/linux-hard-drive-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sigtar.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or lack of.
You must insure that your drives are using the sata driver (if they are sata disks), quickest way to check is that they will be called sda sdb etc&#8230;. and not hda hdb, as this is the default IDE driver and will slow down the performance majorly.
How to check performance;
hdparm -tT /dev/hda
Modern drives [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/09/01/opensolaris-zfs-pci-e-sata-controller/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: opensolaris &#8211; zfs PCI-e sata controller'>opensolaris &#8211; zfs PCI-e sata controller</a> <small>Time for me to add some more sata ports to...</small></li>
</ol>

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or lack of.</p>
<p>You must insure that your drives are using the sata driver (if they are sata disks), quickest way to check is that they will be called sda sdb etc&#8230;. and not hda hdb, as this is the default IDE driver and will slow down the performance majorly.</p>
<p><span class="mw-headline">How to check performance;</span></p>
<p><strong>hdparm -tT /dev/hda</strong></p>
<p>Modern drives should be getting over 50MB/s easily. If your getting about 5MB/s you have the problem.</p>
<p><span class="mw-headline">How to Fix;</span></p>
<p>I had to change the sata mode to Enhanced in the bios and disable any of the on-board IDE controllers. When rebooting all your device names will change, and you will need to edit the <strong>/etc/fstab</strong> file as appropriate.</p>
<p>Apparently this is due to a conflict in the drivers, and them confusing your SATA drives as standard IDE disks.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://sigtar.com/2009/09/01/opensolaris-zfs-pci-e-sata-controller/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: opensolaris &#8211; zfs PCI-e sata controller'>opensolaris &#8211; zfs PCI-e sata controller</a> <small>Time for me to add some more sata ports to...</small></li>
</ol></p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://mitcho.com/code/yarpp/'>Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sigtar.com/2009/02/03/linux-hard-drive-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
