<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Compression on sigtar.com</title>
		<link>https://sigtar.com/tags/compression/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Compression on sigtar.com</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-nz</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +1200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://sigtar.com/tags/compression/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>zfs compression and latency</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Since im using ZFS as storage via NFS for my some of my vmware environments i need to ensure that latency on my disk is reduced where ever possible.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There is alot of talk about ZFS compression being &amp;ldquo;faster&amp;rdquo; than a non-compressed pool due to less physical data being pulled off the drives. This of course depends on the system powering ZFS, but i wanted to run some tests specifically on latency. Throughput is fine in some situations, but latency is a killer when it comes to lots of small reads and writes (in the case of hosting virtual machines)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ZFS compression types</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/01/30/zfs-compression-types/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/01/30/zfs-compression-types/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;ZFS compression as of OpenSolaris 2008.11 has a few types to choose from.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;lzjb (default) | gzip | gzip-[1-9]&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They are used via the &lt;strong&gt;zfs set compression=gzip&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;poolname&lt;/strong&gt; command.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The following test was quickly done out of personal interest - and is in no way scientific!&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I have a AMD cpu with 3 cores (2.4Ghz). The data i copied to each of the shares consisted of video / documents / pictures and music. The first test i have done is based on compression only (i have not measured throughput)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
