<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Core on sigtar.com</title>
		<link>https://sigtar.com/tags/core/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Core on sigtar.com</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-nz</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +1200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://sigtar.com/tags/core/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>change windows 2012 to core mode</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2015/08/14/change-windows-2012-to-core-mode/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2015/08/14/change-windows-2012-to-core-mode/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://sigtar.com/2015/08/14/change-windows-2012-to-core-mode/download-3/&#34;&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/download.png&#34; alt=&#34;download&#34;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Found yourself considering hyper-v? Microsoft has come a long way and is now becoming more popular as a serious contender in the hypervisor area. My preference is still VMware, but some businesses may find their Microsoft allegiance makes hyper-v a valid option.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Note, i do not consider Microsoft a &amp;ldquo;cheaper&amp;rdquo; solution in any circumstance. The current state of hyper-v, SDN options, clustering and VMM management falls very short of what VMware has out of the box. Anyhow, if you do choose windows, here is how you remove the GUI - hopefully saving you a little bit of RAM and reducing the running footprint open for attacks and vulnerabilities&amp;hellip;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
