<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Software-Raid on sigtar.com</title>
		<link>https://sigtar.com/tags/software-raid/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Software-Raid on sigtar.com</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-nz</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://sigtar.com/tags/software-raid/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>fakeRAID vs Software RAID (windows)</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/06/fakeraid-vs-software-raid/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/06/fakeraid-vs-software-raid/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;O.k. here is the latest from atomic magazine&amp;hellip; I&amp;rsquo;m talking about RAID 0 (stripe) here.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Software RAID (i.e. windows stripe) is faster (both in throughput and seek time) than the &amp;ldquo;hardware&amp;rdquo; fake RAID built in to most new mother boards. Apparently it doesn&amp;rsquo;t matter about the stripe size of your raid either&amp;hellip;. Software raid still wins??&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m a bit skeptical about this, and will have to en devour on a few tests to conclude whether this is true or not&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
