<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Zfs on sigtar.com</title>
		<link>https://sigtar.com/tags/zfs/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Zfs on sigtar.com</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-nz</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +1200</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://sigtar.com/tags/zfs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>zfs share for Time machine backups</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2013/07/11/zfs-share-for-time-machine-backups/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2013/07/11/zfs-share-for-time-machine-backups/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve tried using a share for time machine before, but due to the nature of how time machine works it eventually consumed all the spare space that is available on that particular share.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;bring on zfs quotas&amp;hellip; (my drive on my mini mac is 100GB, so 200GB should be enough for a few variations)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs set quota=200G unprotected/timemachine&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This adds a artificial limit to your zfs filesystem, making sure that time machine does not consume more than 200 gigabytes of space.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Why is UNRAID cool for home?</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2013/05/18/why-is-unraid-cool-for-home/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2013/05/18/why-is-unraid-cool-for-home/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve played with many storage technologies at home, ZFS being one of my favs when it comes to performance. But i&amp;rsquo;ve been looking for something that suits a typical home environment where power usage and capacity is usually more important than performance. Thats where UNRAID has come in&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;UNRAID give me these advantages;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Different sized disks in a single pool (only requires largest disk as parity)&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Files are distributed over all the disks - so even if you lost more than a single drive you still still have some of your data. Note : with parity drive you can handle a single drive failing without loosing anything, sorta like RAID4 - non distributed parity.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Power usage, since the files are stored on specific disks not all the disks need to power on to give you your file.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Runs on a USB stick - no large operating system required.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Crashplan module can be installed to provide backup options.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://lime-technology.com/&#34;&gt;http://lime-technology.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>solaris - storage server</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2011/07/11/solaris-storage-server/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2011/07/11/solaris-storage-server/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://p2v.it/2010/04/15/a-next-generation-multiprotocol-storage-for-your-homelab-on-a-budget-part-1/&#34;&gt;http://p2v.it/2010/04/15/a-next-generation-multiprotocol-storage-for-your-homelab-on-a-budget-part-1/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Setup iSCSI target using comstar &amp;ndash; &lt;strong&gt;pkg install -v storage-server pkg install pkg:/SUNWiscsit svcadm enable stmf svcadm enable svc:/network/iscsi/target:default itadm create-target&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;reboot &amp;ndash; -r&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Create the iSCSI store &amp;mdash; &lt;strong&gt;zfs create -V 100G DataPool/TestDatastore1 sbdadm create-lu /dev/zvol/rdsk/DataPool/TestDatastore1 stmfadm create-hg ESX4-group stmfadm add-hg-member -g ESX4-group wwn.2100001b329711bd wwn.2101001b32b711bd stmfadm add-view -h ESX4-group -n 0 600144F03EBEC50000004BA86E460001 stmfadm list-lu -v&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>zfs : accidentally adding cache drive to raidz zpool</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2011/05/04/zfs-accidentally-adding-cache-drive-to-raidz-zpool/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2011/05/04/zfs-accidentally-adding-cache-drive-to-raidz-zpool/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=23127&#34;&gt;http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=23127&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately if you have accidentally added a single drive into your raidz pool at the top-level there is no way to just remove the non redundant disk. Your pool is now &lt;strong&gt;dependant&lt;/strong&gt; on this disk.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If you want your pool to be just raidz vdevs, then you will need to backup your data, destroy your pool, create a new pool, and restore your data.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;There is no current way to remove a top-level vdev from a pool.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>4k sector hard drives and zfs</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2010/06/06/4k-sector-hard-drives-and-zfs/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2010/06/06/4k-sector-hard-drives-and-zfs/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I hit this as a problem recently. One of my disks died in my raidz so i ran down to the store and grabbed me a replacement WD10EARS (Western Digital 1Tb Green) drive.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;BUT&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The one thing the store didn&amp;rsquo;t mention to me is the new 4K cluster sizing on the drive. I guess they assume most people run windows (though the issues are also present in XP). See these posts&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>zfs - now has dedup!</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2010/04/05/zfs-now-has-dedup/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Cool. zfs as of version 21 has deduplication built in. And thats the good dedup - synchronous dedup. i.e. deduped on the fly!&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;How easy is it to turn on? - very!&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Once you have upgraded your zpool to 21 or above you can run the following command at the pool level and deduplication will be over all your data from that point onwards.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zpool set dedup=on tank&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Done&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Note : Watch your performance, it will drop like a rock if you do not have enough ram for your dedup tables. Do some tests after enabling this feature.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>OpenSolaris - iSCSI</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/11/13/iscsi-in-opensolaris/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Want iSCSI in opensolaris?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Grab SUNWiscsitgt via package manager.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;enable the server via svcadm;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;svcadm enable iscsitgt&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;create your zfs iscsi pool;  (this command will limit iscsi drive to 500GB in size)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs create -V 500G tank/iscsi&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;set isci on via zfs command;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs set shareiscsi=on tank/iscsi&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;check that target is up and running;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;iscsitadm list target -v&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Done. Should be able to connect via ip from another machine. I have not covered CHAP or any client side configuration. Assumed isolated LAN.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>FreeNAS - zfs in version 0.7</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/10/28/freenas-zfs-in-version-0-7/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/10/28/freenas-zfs-in-version-0-7/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;If you want to give zfs a go and also want a dedicated file server this is the solution.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Check it out here;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.freenas.org/&#34;&gt;http://www.freenas.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/smart.png&#34;&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/smart.png&#34; alt=&#34;smart&#34; title=&#34;smart&#34;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m still using opensolaris though as i like running a few virtualbox machines on the same box.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Opensolaris - ZFS recovery after kernel panic</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/10/19/opensolaris-zfs-recovery-after-kernel-panic/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/10/19/opensolaris-zfs-recovery-after-kernel-panic/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Recently i hit what i thought was a huge disaster with my ZFS array. Essentially i was unable to import my zpool without causing the kernel to panic and reboot. Still unsure of the exact reason, but it didn&amp;rsquo;t seem to be due to a hardware fault. (zpool import showed all disks as ONLINE)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;When i tried to import with &lt;strong&gt;zpool import -f tank&lt;/strong&gt; the machine would lockup and reboot (panic).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>opensolaris - zfs PCI-e sata controller</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/09/01/opensolaris-zfs-pci-e-sata-controller/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/09/01/opensolaris-zfs-pci-e-sata-controller/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Time for me to add some more sata ports to my opensolaris build. I&amp;rsquo;ve been using the &lt;a href=&#34;https://sigtar.com/2009/05/20/flashing-si3114-to-sata-only-bios/&#34;&gt;SI 3114 PCI&lt;/a&gt; cards  (4x sata) up until now without any issue, but they are limited by the bandwidth on the PCI slot. Time to upgrade and boost my performance.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;At the moment i&amp;rsquo;m looking at grabbing one of these UIO cards;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/AOC-USAS-L8i.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/AOC-USAS-L8i.gif&#34; alt=&#34;AOC-USAS-L8i&#34; title=&#34;AOC-USAS-L8i&#34;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USAS-L8i.cfm&#34;&gt;http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-USAS-L8i.cfm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;From what iv&amp;rsquo;e been reading these cards will work fine in a PCI-e slot (8x / 16x) after a bit of modding and display the drives straight to opensolaris without any additional drivers etc. (same chipset used in various sun servers)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>zfs compression and latency</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/08/19/zfs-compression-and-latency/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Since im using ZFS as storage via NFS for my some of my vmware environments i need to ensure that latency on my disk is reduced where ever possible.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;There is alot of talk about ZFS compression being &amp;ldquo;faster&amp;rdquo; than a non-compressed pool due to less physical data being pulled off the drives. This of course depends on the system powering ZFS, but i wanted to run some tests specifically on latency. Throughput is fine in some situations, but latency is a killer when it comes to lots of small reads and writes (in the case of hosting virtual machines)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>OpenSolaris - Samba server</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/08/08/opensolaris-samba-server/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/08/08/opensolaris-samba-server/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Time to share your newly created ZFS volume via samba to your windows clients.  There is some CIFS / SMB support built into the kernel now, but i&amp;rsquo;ve grown used to the SMB server&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Fire up add software - click filesystems - enable filter for &amp;ldquo;smb&amp;rdquo;, there are three packages generally. I get all three, but you only need the kernel update and the server package. The other is the SMB client.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Opensolaris : Citrix XenServer / ESX - Hooking into ZFS</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/07/22/citrix-xenserver-esx-hooking-into-zfs/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/07/22/citrix-xenserver-esx-hooking-into-zfs/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;To share your zfs pool via NFS (that works with Citrix Xen / ESX) to a host called &amp;ldquo;esxhost&amp;rdquo;;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs set sharenfs=rw,nosuid,root=esxhost tank/nfs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Note : You MUST have a resolvable name from the opensolaris box. i.e. you should be able to ping it. I have tried with ip&amp;rsquo;s only and it will fail. I have edited the &lt;strong&gt;/etc/hosts&lt;/strong&gt; file to include the following line for my config;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;# Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. # Use is subject to license terms. # # ident &amp;ldquo;%Z%%M% %I% %E% SMI&amp;rdquo; # # Internet host table # 192.168.9.120 esxhost&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>opensolaris / zfs - whitebox build</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/07/19/opensolaris-zfs-whitebox-build/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/07/19/opensolaris-zfs-whitebox-build/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve built a little server for home use, but it pales in comparison to this beast&amp;hellip; This type of setup would be perfect for a lab / test environment that requires lots of fast and reliable disk. SCSI drives are fading out, SATA can perform if its setup right. When you look at the price of the entire build you wonder why corporations continue to spend the big bucks on the big storage names.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>zfs - playing with various configs</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/07/18/zfs-playing-with-various-configs/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/07/18/zfs-playing-with-various-configs/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;If you dont have the disks available to build up a zpool and have a play with zfs you can actually just use files created with the mkfile command&amp;hellip; The commands are exactly the same.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mkfile 64m disk1&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mkfile 64m disk2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mkfile 64m disk3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mkfile 10m disk4&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mkfile 100m disk5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;mkfile 100m disk6&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now you can create a zpool using the above files&amp;hellip; (i&amp;rsquo;m using raidz for this setup)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zpool create test raidz /fullpath/disk1 /fullpath/disk2 /fullpath/disk3&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Flashing si3114 to sata only bios</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/05/20/flashing-si3114-to-sata-only-bios/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 +1200</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/05/20/flashing-si3114-to-sata-only-bios/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This is the perfect controller for adding additional sata drives into opensolaris (well in terms of price, the bandwidth of the PCI slot is the only negative part). The si3114 comes with the default bios that supports various raid configs, but this requires additional drivers to be loaded.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Essentially the &amp;ldquo;raid&amp;rdquo; on the card is called fakeraid as it does not actually process any data itself, but hooks into the cpu via a driver and lets your cpu do all the work.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Opensolaris - where has my memory gone?</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/03/28/opensolaris-where-has-my-memory-gone/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/03/28/opensolaris-where-has-my-memory-gone/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Use this command in 2008.11 to get details on where your memory is currently being used&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;echo ::memstat | pfexec mdb -k&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Page Summary                Pages                MB  %Tot &amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;     &amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;-  &amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;&amp;mdash;-  &amp;mdash;- Kernel                     263992              1031   34% ZFS File Data               91917               359   12% Anon                       376867              1472   48% Exec and libs               11484                44    1% Page cache                   3387                13    0% Free (cachelist)             9766                38    1% Free (freelist)             24807                96    3%&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Total                      782220              3055 Physical                   782219              3055&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>zfs - java management gui</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/03/18/zfs-java-management-gui/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/03/18/zfs-java-management-gui/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;It hasn&amp;rsquo;t made it into opensolaris yet. But from what i&amp;rsquo;ve heard it should be making an appearance over from the solaris 10 OS soon. Here is a screenshot of what it looks like&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://sigtar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/zfsscreenshot.jpg&#34; alt=&#34;zfsscreenshot&#34; title=&#34;zfsscreenshot&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Should make managing zfs a bit easier - though its already quite easy.  Perhaps if you have quite alot of zpools / zfs file systems it will look prettier.   ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>Troubleshooting - Time Slider (zfs snapshots)</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/03/17/troubleshooting-time-slider-zfs-snapshots/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/03/17/troubleshooting-time-slider-zfs-snapshots/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. snapshot complains about no access to cron&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This problem i came across was after i was playing with crontab. It looks like the zfs snapshot service uses an account called &amp;ldquo;zfssnap&amp;rdquo; and if it doesnt have access to cron then it will have issues creating / checking snapshots. Check the file &lt;strong&gt;/etc/cron.d/cron.allow&lt;/strong&gt; and ensure that &amp;ldquo;zfssnap&amp;rdquo; is in there. The issues i had looked like this in the log&amp;hellip;   (check the logs via the log file viewer)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>zfs - checking your zpool throughput</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/18/zfs-checking-your-zpool-throughput/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/18/zfs-checking-your-zpool-throughput/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite a good diagnostic for checking your disk throughput. Try copying data to and from your zpool while your running this command on the host&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zpool iostat -v unprotected 2&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;pre tabindex=&#34;0&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;capacity     operations    bandwidth&#xA;pool         used  avail   read  write   read  write&#xA;----------  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----&#xA;unprotected  1.39T   668G     18      7  1.35M   161K&#xA;c7d0       696G   403M      1      2  55.1K  21.3K&#xA;c9d0       584G   112G      8      2   631K  69.3K&#xA;c7d1       141G   555G      8      2   697K  70.0K&#xA;----------  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----  -----&#xA;&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;p&gt;The above command will keep displaying the above output every 2 seconds (average during that time). I&amp;rsquo;ve used it a few times to ensure that all disks are being used (in write operations) where needed. Of course read op&amp;rsquo;s may not be typically across all disks as it will depend where the data is&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>OpenSolaris cifs/smb server - configuring ACL&#39;s on shares</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/14/opensolaris-cifssmb-server-configuring-acls-on-shares/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/14/opensolaris-cifssmb-server-configuring-acls-on-shares/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;O.k. from this  point I&amp;rsquo;m assuming you have created your zfs shares via the &lt;strong&gt;zfs&lt;/strong&gt; command and renamed appropriately like so&amp;hellip;..   (&lt;a href=&#34;https://sigtar.com/2009/02/13/opensolaris-migrating-from-samba-to-cifs/&#34;&gt;if you havent setup cifs yet then check read this&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs set sharesmb=on protected/backup&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs set sharesmb=name=backup protected/backup&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now to check your current shares type&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;sharemgr show&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;zfs&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;zfs/protected/backup backup=/protected/backup&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;zfs/protected/photos photos=/protected/photos&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Now its time to look at NFSv4 ACL&amp;rsquo;s. This page has a great explanation of ACL&amp;rsquo;s and how to set things up. &lt;a href=&#34;http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=939&#34;&gt;http://cuddletech.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=939&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ZFS - Creating snapshots</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/09/zfs-creating-snapshots/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/09/zfs-creating-snapshots/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;There is some funky ways of modifying the default &amp;ldquo;time slider&amp;rdquo; services to do the work for you, but i like a bit more hands on. Generally so i know what is happening in the background, but the time slider can be sometimes overkill creating snapshots every 15 mins if not configured properly.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;On a side note i&amp;rsquo;ve yet to get my head around the SMF stuff properly&amp;hellip; Anyhow onto creating snapshots.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ZFS - Removing all snapshots</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/08/zfs-removing-all-snapshots/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/08/zfs-removing-all-snapshots/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;To list all of your current snapshots;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;zfs list -t snapshot&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is a handy script to remove all snapshots&amp;hellip;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;for snapshot in `zfs list -H -t snapshot | cut -f 1` do zfs destroy $snapshot done&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As always : at your own risk. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>fakeRAID vs Software RAID (windows)</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/06/fakeraid-vs-software-raid/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/06/fakeraid-vs-software-raid/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;O.k. here is the latest from atomic magazine&amp;hellip; I&amp;rsquo;m talking about RAID 0 (stripe) here.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Software RAID (i.e. windows stripe) is faster (both in throughput and seek time) than the &amp;ldquo;hardware&amp;rdquo; fake RAID built in to most new mother boards. Apparently it doesn&amp;rsquo;t matter about the stripe size of your raid either&amp;hellip;. Software raid still wins??&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m a bit skeptical about this, and will have to en devour on a few tests to conclude whether this is true or not&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ZFS - Error 16 : Inconsistent filesystem structure</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/02/zfs-error-16-inconsistent-filesystem-structure/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/02/02/zfs-error-16-inconsistent-filesystem-structure/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh no. I&amp;rsquo;ve managed to get this error before. And it was right after i applied compression to the &lt;strong&gt;rpool&lt;/strong&gt; zfs filesystem. Upon the next reboot i was greeted with this error message;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Error 16 : Inconsistent filesystem structure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For me it was a show stopper and i had to go into recovery. So i&amp;rsquo;ve learnt my lesson - Not to touch the rpool zpool.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I was lucky enough to have put my data within a zfs filesystem (rpool/virtual) i created within the default rpool zpool.  I use this spot for my VirtualBox virtual machines.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ZFS basics</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/01/30/zfs-basics/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/01/30/zfs-basics/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve had a play with WHS but eventually got annoyed with its lack of performance. Yes i know its not built for performance and typically is used just as a backup / simple store with duplication as redundancy, just i couldn&amp;rsquo;t stand the speed of the thing. If you were ever unlucky enough (even post power pack 1) to do a copy during the &amp;ldquo;data moving&amp;rdquo; the performance was even worse. On a positive note nothing beats it if you have a heap of non-similar sized disks that you want to put together (with redundancy) as a single shared storage pool.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>ZFS compression types</title>
				<link>https://sigtar.com/2009/01/30/zfs-compression-types/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +1300</pubDate>
				<guid>https://sigtar.com/2009/01/30/zfs-compression-types/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;ZFS compression as of OpenSolaris 2008.11 has a few types to choose from.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;lzjb (default) | gzip | gzip-[1-9]&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;They are used via the &lt;strong&gt;zfs set compression=gzip&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;poolname&lt;/strong&gt; command.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The following test was quickly done out of personal interest - and is in no way scientific!&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I have a AMD cpu with 3 cores (2.4Ghz). The data i copied to each of the shares consisted of video / documents / pictures and music. The first test i have done is based on compression only (i have not measured throughput)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
